4.8 Article

Spectroscopic and theoretical studies of mononuclear copper(II) alkyl- and hydroperoxo complexes: Electronic structure contributions to reactivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 122, 期 41, 页码 10177-10193

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja0016755

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectroscopic studies combined with calculations are used to describe the electronic structure and vibrational properties of mononuclear four-coordinate end-on alkylperoxo and hydroperoxo Cu(II) complexes. EPR defines a Cu x(2)-y(2) ground state with similar to 62% Cu character. From absorption, MCD, and resonance Raman spectroscopies, the main bonding interaction between the alkyl(hydro)peroxide and Cu(LI) is found to involve the pi -donation of the alkyl(hydro)peroxide pi*(v) into the Cu x(2)-y(2) orbital, which dominates the observed spectroscopic features, producing an intense absorption band at similar to 16 600 cm(-1) (similar to 600 nm). On the basis of the vibrational frequencies, isotope shifts, and normal coordinate analyses, the dominant vibrations of the alkyl(hydro)peroxo complexes are assigned and the Cu-O and O-O force constants are determined. The observed strong Cu-O bond and the large alkyl(hydro)peroxide-to-Cu(II) charge donation are ascribed to the low coordination number of Cu and the distorted T-d ligand field. The observed strong O-O bond mainly derives from polarization by the alkylcarbon/proton. The unoccupied peroxide sigma* orbital is also greatly stabilized in energy, and the complexes are activated for electrophilic attack. Experimentally calibrated density functional calculations, coupled with frontier molecular orbital theory, are employed to obtain insight into the reactivity of these model complexes. Mechanisms of electrophilic attack, O-O bond cleavage, and H atom abstraction are evaluated, and their relevance to dopamine beta -monooxygenase and peptidylglycine alpha -hydroxylating monooxygenase reactivities is considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据