4.3 Article

The FRAX® as a predictor of mortality in Japanese incident hemodialysis patients: an observational, follow-up study

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 674-683

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-014-0631-5

关键词

CKD; FRAX; Hemodialysis; Mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX((R))) was recently developed to estimate the 10-year absolute risk of osteoporotic fracture among the general population. However, the evidence for its use in chronic kidney disease patients has been lacking, and the association between the FRAX((R)) and mortality is unknown. Therefore, a hospital-based, prospective, cohort study was conducted to evaluate the predictive ability of the FRAX((R)) for mortality in hemodialysis patients. A total of 252 patients who had been started on maintenance hemodialysis, 171 men and 81 women, with a mean age of 67 +/- A 14 years, was studied. The endpoint was defined as all-cause death. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals. During the mean follow-up period of 3.4 +/- A 2.7 years, 61 deaths occurred. The median (interquartile range) of the FRAX((R)) for major osteoporotic fracture was 6.9 (4.6-12.0) % in men and 19.0 (7.6-33.0) % in women. Cumulative survival rates at 5 years after starting dialysis, with the FRAX((R)) levels above and below the median, were 51.9 and 87.9 %, respectively, in men and 67.4 and 83.7 %, respectively, in women. Overall, in men, the multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that the log-transformed FRAX((R)) remained an independent predictor of death after adjusting by confounding variables. However, in women, the significant association between the FRAX((R)) value and the outcome was eliminated if age was put into these models. Among Japanese hemodialysis patients, the FRAX((R)) seems to be useful for predicting death, especially in men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据