4.7 Article

Analysis of gene expression data using a linear mixed model/finite mixture model approach: application to regional differences in the human brain

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 1555-1561

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu088

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC through the MRC Sudden Death Brain Bank
  2. King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Saudi Arabia
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at King's College London
  4. [G0901254]
  5. MRC [G0901254] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0901254] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: Gene expression data exhibit common information over the genome. This article shows how data can be analysed from an efficient whole-genome perspective. Further, the methods have been developed so that users with limited expertise in bioinformatics and statistical computing techniques could use and modify this procedure to their own needs. The method outlined first uses a large-scale linear mixed model for the expression data genome-wide, and then uses finite mixture models to separate differentially expressed (DE) from non-DE transcripts. These methods are illustrated through application to an exceptional UK Brain Expression Consortium involving 12 human frozen post-mortem brain regions. Results: Fitting linear mixed models has allowed variation in gene expression between different biological states (e.g. brain regions, gender, age) to be investigated. The model can be extended to allow for differing levels of variation between different biological states. Predicted values of the random effects show the effects of each transcript in a particular biological state. Using the UK Brain Expression Consortium data, this approach yielded striking patterns of co-regional gene expression. Fitting the finite mixture model to the effects within each state provides a convenient method to filter transcripts that are DE: these DE transcripts can then be extracted for advanced functional analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据