4.7 Article

Protein-driven inference of miRNA-disease associations

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 392-397

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt677

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research (Technology and Production Sciences)
  2. Danish Center for Scientific Computing
  3. Danish Council for Strategic Research (Programme Commission on Strategic Growth Technologies)
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research [PI Lars Juhl Jensen] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a highly abundant class of non-coding RNA genes involved in cellular regulation and thus also diseases. Despite miRNAs being important disease factors, miRNA-disease associations remain low in number and of variable reliability. Furthermore, existing databases and prediction methods do not explicitly facilitate forming hypotheses about the possible molecular causes of the association, thereby making the path to experimental follow-up longer. Results: Here we present miRPD in which miRNA-Protein-Disease associations are explicitly inferred. Besides linking miRNAs to diseases, it directly suggests the underlying proteins involved, which can be used to form hypotheses that can be experimentally tested. The inference of miRNAs and diseases is made by coupling known and predicted miRNA-protein associations with protein-disease associations text mined from the literature. We present scoring schemes that allow us to rank miRNA-disease associations inferred from both curated and predicted miRNA targets by reliability and thereby to create high-and medium-confidence sets of associations. Analyzing these, we find statistically significant enrichment for proteins involved in pathways related to cancer and type I diabetes mellitus, suggesting either a literature bias or a genuine biological trend. We show by example how the associations can be used to extract proteins for disease hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据