4.6 Article

Integrin α1β1 and transforming growth factor-β1 play distinct roles in Alport glomerular pathogenesis and serve as dual targets for metabolic therapy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 157, 期 5, 页码 1649-1659

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64802-X

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [P01 DC01813] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK51711, R01 DK055000, R01 DK55000] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alport syndrome is a genetic disorder resulting from mutations in type IV collagen genes. The defect results in pathological changes in kidney glomerular and inner-ear basement membranes. In the kidney, progressive glomerulonephritis culminates in tubulointerstitial fibrosis and death. Using gene knockout-mouse models, we demonstrate that two different pathways, one mediated by transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and the other by integrin alpha1 beta1, affect Alport glomerular pathogenesis in distinct ways. In Alport mice that are also null, for integrin alpha1 expression, expansion of the mesangial matrix and podocyte foot process effacement are attenuated. The novel observation of nonnative laminin isoforms (laminin-2 and/or laminin-3) accumulating in the glomerular basement membrane of Alport mice is markedly reduced in the double knockouts. The second pathway, mediated by TGF-beta1, was blocked using a soluble fusion protein comprising the extracellular domain of the TGF-beta1 type II receptor. This inhibitor prevents focal thickening of the glomerular basement membrane, but does not prevent effacement of the podocyte foot processes. If both Integrin alpha1 beta1 and TGF-beta1 pathways are functionally inhibited, glomerular foot process and glomerular basement membrane morphology are primarily restored and renal function is markedly improved. These data suggest that integrin alpha1 beta1 and TGF-beta1 may provide useful targets for a dual therapy aimed at slowing disease progression in Alport glomerulonephritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据