4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphatic mapping in nodular thyroid neoplasms

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 1396-1401

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s002680010231

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the prognostic significance of occult lymph node metastases in thyroid cancer remains controversial, identifying these patients may help direct therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) in thyroid nodular disease. Patients undergoing thyroid resection, with no evidence of clinical lymphadenopathy, were enrolled. The nodule was injected with isosulfan blue vital dye, flue-stained lymphatic channels were traced within the central compartment to the SLN, which was excised. A total of 40 patients underwent SLNBx; lymphatics were seen in 31 patients, and SLNs were found in 26. In 11 patients the lymphatic vessels were traced through the central compartment into the lateral or mediastinal compartments, although a central SLN was retrieved in only 6. Of the 18 patients with benign neoplasms, 14 had benign SLNs, and no SLN was found in 4. A thyroid lymphoma patient had a true positive SLN. In the 12 patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), 6 had true positive SLNs, and 2 had a true negative SLN. In one patient with metastatic PTC, the parathyroid stained blue. Another patient with PTC had lateral lymphatic channels, but no SLN was found. There were two false negatives, proven by a node dissection in one and lateral uptake on I-131 scanning in the other. There were no postoperative complications. SLNBx for thyroid disease is feasible and safe. Potential staining of the parathyroids makes their identification before injection mandatory. The variable lymphatic drainage patterns and the two false-negative nodes indicate that further investigation is required before the procedure can be recommended for patients with thyroid disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据