4.7 Article

Reference-independent comparative metagenomics using cross-assembly: crAss

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 28, 期 24, 页码 3225-3231

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts613

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Division of Biological Infrastructure grant [0850356]
  2. Division of Environmental Biology grant [1046413]
  3. Dutch Science foundation (NWO) Veni grant [016.111.075]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1046413] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0850356] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1330800] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MOTIVATION: Metagenomes are often characterized by high levels of unknown sequences. Reads derived from known microorganisms can easily be identified and analyzed using fast homology search algorithms and a suitable reference database, but the unknown sequences are often ignored in further analyses, biasing conclusions. Nevertheless, it is possible to use more data in a comparative metagenomic analysis by creating a cross-assembly of all reads, i.e. a single assembly of reads from different samples. Comparative metagenomics studies the interrelationships between metagenomes from different samples. Using an assembly algorithm is a fast and intuitive way to link (partially) homologous reads without requiring a database of reference sequences. RESULTS: Here, we introduce crAss, a novel bioinformatic tool that enables fast simple analysis of cross-assembly files, yielding distances between all metagenomic sample pairs and an insightful image displaying the similarities. Availability and implementation: crAss is available as a web server at http://edwards.sdsu.edu/crass/, and the Perl source code can be downloaded to run as a stand-alone command line tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据