4.4 Article

A new thermoactive pullulanase from Desulfurococcus mucosus:: Cloning, sequencing, purification, and characterization of the recombinant enzyme after expression in Bacillus subtilis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 182, 期 22, 页码 6331-6338

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.22.6331-6338.2000

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gene encoding a thermoactive pullulanase from the hyperthermophilic anaerobic archaeon Desulfurococcus mucosus (apuA) was cloned in Escherichia coli and sequenced. apuA from D. mucosus showed 45.4% pairwise amino acid identity with the pullulanase from Thermococcus aggregans and contained the four regions conserved among all amylolytic enzymes, apuA encodes a protein of 686 amino acids with a 28-residue signal peptide and has a predicted mass of 74 kDa after signal cleavage. The apuA gene was then expressed in Bacillus subtilis and secreted into the culture fluid. This is one of the first reports on the successful expression and purification of an archaeal amylopullulanase in a Bacillus strain. The purified recombinant enzyme (rapuDm) is composed of two subunits, each having an estimated molecular mass of 66 kDa. Optimal activity was measured at 85 degreesC within a broad pH range from 3.5 to 8.5, with an optimum at pH 5.0. Bivalent cations have no influence on the stability or activity of the enzyme. RapuDm was stable at 80 degreesC for 4 h and exhibited a half-life of 50 min at 85 degreesC. By high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis it was observed that rapuDm hydrolyzed alpha -1,6 glycosidic linkages of pullulan, producing maltotriose, and also alpha -1,4 glycosidic linkages in starch, amylose, amylopectin, and cyclodextrins, with maltotriose and maltose as the main products. Since the thermoactive pullulanases known so far from Archaea are not active on cyclodextrins and are in fact inhibited by these cyclic oligosaccharides, the enzyme from D. mucosus should be considered an archaeal pullulanase type II with a wider substrate specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据