4.7 Article

Analysis of anthraquinoid and indigoid dyes used in ancient artistic works by thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation in the presence of tetramethylammonium hydroxide

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL AND APPLIED PYROLYSIS
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 167-178

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00092-9

关键词

tetramethylammonium hydroxide; thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation; thermochemolysis; pyrolysis; gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; madder; cochineal; indigo; hydroxyanthraquinones

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation (THM) in the presence of tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) was applied to the analysis of red dyes based on the 9,10-anthracenedione skeleton (anthraquinone), namely alizarin, quinizarin, purpurin, carminic acid, and the blue pigment indigo. Alizarin and purpurin are the principal coloured compounds of madder, and carninic acid of cochineal red. Synthetic dyes were dissolved in aqueous TMAH, pyrolysed at 700 degrees C for 10 s and the evolved thermochemolytic products were analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The resulting chromatograms of all the madder dyes were characterised by the presence of the methyl esters of 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid (dimethyl-o-phthalate) and benzoic acid. In addition, thermochemolysis of alizarin and quinizarin afforded 1,2-dimethoxyanthraquinone and 1,4-dimethoxyanthraquinone, respectively. Carminic acid produced a series of methylated fragments deriving from both the substituted anthraquinoid moiety and the glycosidically-Clinked glucose. Finally, the principal thermochemolysis products of indigo were the N-methylated derivatives of 2-amino benzoic acid methyl ester followed by methylated aniline and indoles. The potential of THM as a rapid technique for the identification of dyes in real samples was illustrated by the analysis of madder lake, cochineal lake, and natural indigo dispersed in a binder. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据