4.7 Article

PASSion: a pattern growth algorithm-based pipeline for splice junction detection in paired-end RNA-Seq data

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 479-486

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr712

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing [05060810]
  2. European Union [259679]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research VENI [639.021.125]
  4. European Commission [261123]
  5. Centre for Medical Systems Biology of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: RNA-seq is a powerful technology for the study of transcriptome profiles that uses deep- sequencing technologies. Moreover, it may be used for cellular phenotyping and help establishing the etiology of diseases characterized by abnormal splicing patterns. In RNA- Seq, the exact nature of splicing events is buried in the reads that span exon- exon boundaries. The accurate and efficient mapping of these reads to the reference genome is a major challenge. Results: We developed PASSion, a pattern growth algorithm-based pipeline for splice site detection in paired-end RNA-Seq reads. Comparing the performance of PASSion to three existing RNA-Seq analysis pipelines, TopHat, MapSplice and HMMSplicer, revealed that PASSion is competitive with these packages. Moreover, the performance of PASSion is not affected by read length and coverage. It performs better than the other three approaches when detecting junctions in highly abundant transcripts. PASSion has the ability to detect junctions that do not have known splicing motifs, which cannot be found by the other tools. Of the two public RNA-Seq datasets, PASSion predicted similar to 137 000 and 173 000 splicing events, of which on average 82 are known junctions annotated in the Ensembl transcript database and 18% are novel. In addition, our package can discover differential and shared splicing patterns among multiple samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据