4.7 Article

Effect of fruit maturity on efficiency of 1-methylcyclopropene to delay the ripening of bananas

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 303-308

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00150-2

关键词

banana; ripening; 1-methylcyclopropene; maturity; ethylene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three bunches of unripe 'Williams' banana fruit of different maturity, 173, 156 and 71 days from bunch emergence, were harvested. Fruit from the top, bottom and middle hands from each bunch were fumigated for 24 h with 1-methylcyclopropene (I-MCP) at 0, 5, 50 or 500 nl l(-1) at 20 degreesC. All fruit were then stored at 20 degreesC in air containing 0.1 mul l(-1) ethylene and the time taken for each fruit to ripen (green life) was noted. The green life of fruit treated with 500 nl l(-1) 1-MCP varied with fruit maturity. In the two most mature bunches it was 27.9 +/- 2.3 days, 4-fold longer than fruit fumigated with 0 nl l(-1) I-MCP (6.7 +/- 0.6 days). In the least mature bunch, green life was 39.7 +/- 3.0 days, 1.5-fold longer than fruit fumigated with 0 nl l(-1) I-MCP (25.7 +/- 2.5 days). Most fruit treated with 500 nl l(-1) 1-MCP showed an unacceptable uneven skin colouration when ripe. There was no significant effect on green life of 1-MCP at 50 nl l(-1) and 5 nl l(-1). Other fruit from these bunches were not exposed to 1-MCP and were held in ethylene-free air until ripe. In the two most mature bunches, these fruit had a significantly shorter green life (11.2 +/- 5.6 days in hand 1; 18.9 +/- 4.1 days in hands 4 and 6) than fruit that were fumigated with 500 nl l(-1) ' 1-MCP. In the least mature bunch, however, these fruit had a significantly longer green life (56.0 +/- 5.9 days) than I-MCP treated fruit. Since the effectiveness of I-MCP varied with fruit maturity and in any commercial consignment there is a mixture of fruit maturity, it is concluded that I-MCP has limited commercial potential for the storage of unripe 'Williams' bananas. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据