4.1 Article

Nonlocal nature of the electron energy spectrum in a glow discharge in pure O2:: I.: Nonlocal character of the electron distribution function

期刊

PLASMA PHYSICS REPORTS
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 972-979

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA PUBL
DOI: 10.1134/1.1323562

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study is made of the nonlocal nature of the electron energy distribution function in the positive column of a glow discharge in a tube filled with pure oxygen. The distribution function and the axial (E-z) and radial (E-r) electric fields as functions of radius are measured using an array of mobile probes. The experimentally obtained spatial profiles of the distribution function are used to test the applicability of the two-term approximation to the distribution function of the electrons with a nonlocal energy spectrum. The distribution function in a specified electric field E = E-z+ E-r. (where E(z)perpendicular toE(r)) is calculated by solving the coordinate-dependent Boltzmann equation in the two-term approximation and by directly integrating the equations of election motion using the Monte Carlo method. A comparison between the experimental data and the results of simulations carried out for a broad parameter range shows that, in the case of a highly nonlocal electron energy spectrum, the two-term approximation makes it possible to calculate the electron distribution function with a fairly good accuracy, in which case, however, in imposing the boundary conditions, the electron losses at the plasma surface should be treated in the kinetic approximation. It is shown that using the reflection coefficient of the plasma surface for electrons instead of the loss cone in space makes it possible to accurately calculate the electron energy distribution function over the entire parameter range under consideration, including the transient region in which the electron-energy relaxation length is comparable to the characteristic plasma dimension. (C) 2000 MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据