4.7 Article

EpiGPU: exhaustive pairwise epistasis scans parallelized on consumer level graphics cards

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 1462-1465

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr172

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Biosciences KTN
  4. Newsham Choice Genetics
  5. BBSRC [BB/H024484/2, BBS/E/R/00001604] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MC_PC_U127592696, MC_U127592696] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/R/00001604, BB/H024484/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_U127592696, MC_U127592696] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: Hundreds of genome-wide association studies have been performed over the last decade, but as single nucleotide polymorphism ( SNP) chip density has increased so has the computational burden to search for epistasis [ for n SNPs the computational time resource is O(n(n-1)/2)]. While the theoretical contribution of epistasis toward phenotypes of medical and economic importance is widely discussed, empirical evidence is conspicuously absent because its analysis is often computationally prohibitive. To facilitate resolution in this field, tools must be made available that can render the search for epistasis universally viable in terms of hardware availability, cost and computational time. Results: By partitioning the 2D search grid across the multicore architecture of a modern consumer graphics processing unit (GPU), we report a 92x increase in the speed of an exhaustive pairwise epistasis scan for a quantitative phenotype, and we expect the speed to increase as graphics cards continue to improve. To achieve a comparable computational improvement without a graphics card would require a large compute-cluster, an option that is often financially non-viable. The implementation presented uses OpenCL-an open-source library designed to run on any commercially available GPU and on any operating system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据