4.3 Article

Cryopreservation of sperm in common carp Cyprinus carpio:: Sperm motility and hatching success of embryos

期刊

CRYOBIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 241-250

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/cryo.2000.2284

关键词

fish; common carp Cyprinus carpio; sperm; motility; velocity; hatching; cryopreservation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, fish sperm cryopreservation methods were elaborated upon for ex situ conservation of nine strains of Bohemian common carp. Common carp sperm were diluted in Kurokura medium and chilled to 4 degreesC and dimethyl sulfoxide was added. Cryotubes of sperm with media were then cooled from +4 to -9 degreesC at a rate of 4 degreesC min(-1) and then from -9 to -80 degreesC at a rate of 11 degreesC min(-1), held for 6 min at -80 degreesC, and finally transferred into liquid N-2. The spermatozoa were thawed in a water bath at 35 degreesC for 110 s and checked for Fertilization yield, hatching yield of embryos, and larval malformations. Fresh and frozen/thawed sperm were evaluated for the percentage and for the velocity of motile sperm from video frames using image analysis. The percentage and velocity of sperm motility at 15 s after activation of frozen/thawed sperm was significantly lower than that of fresh sperm (nine males). ANOVA showed a significant influence of fresh vs frozen/thawed sperm on fertilization rate (P < 0.0001), but differences in hatching rate and in larval malformation (0-6.8%) were not significant, and different males had a significant influence on fertilization and hatching rate (P < 0.003 and P < 0.007, respectively), Multiple range analysis (LSD) showed significant differences between fresh and frozen/thawed sperm regarding fertilization rate (68 +/- 11 and 56 +/- 10% respectively) and insignificant differences between fresh and frozen/thawed sperm on the hatching rate (50 +/- 18 and 52 +/- 9%, respectively). The percentage and velocity of fresh sperm motility were correlated, respectively, with the fertilization yield of frozen/thawed sperm at the levels r = 0.51 and r = 0.54. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据