4.4 Article

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: an oncologic feasible option

期刊

SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 127-134

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-7404(01)00002-0

关键词

laparoscopy; colon cancer; colectomy; lymphadenectomy; port site

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conventional and accepted treatment for curative resection of colon cancer is laparotomy with hemicolectomy For right or left sided lesions. The technique of colon rejection through an open laparotomy incision is well known. Over the past several years, laparoscopically assisted colectomy has been developed and studied. Following the explosion of laparoscopic technology from the cholecystectomy experience and with acquisition of advanced general laparoscopic techniques. The right, left or sigmoid colon can be mobilized and regional lymphadenectomy performed using laparoscopic instruments and video-imaging equipment. The advantage of laparoscopic colectomy is the use of small abdominal port site and wound incisions which translate to reduced postoperative pain and analgesic requirement, earlier return of bowel function and normal physical activities, and shorter hospital stay without increasing health care costs. Laparoscopic colectomy compares Favorably with open colectomy in terms of surgical morbidity and mortality. The laparoscopic approach has been shown to be technically and oncologically Feasible with equivalent lymph node harvest from mesenteric lymphadenectomy and achieves adequate proximal and distal margins of colonic resection. Despite initial early anecdotal reports of port site cancer recurrence in laparoscopically assisted colectomy, port site recurrence is rare and its incidence is similar to incisional recurrences in conventional open colectomy. Recent prospective comparative studies have demonstrated equivalent patient survival and equivalent local or distant colon cancer recurrences For open versus laparoscopic curative resection of colon cancer. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据