4.7 Article

Protein complex prediction based on simultaneous protein interaction network

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 385-391

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp668

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea government (MEST) (Korea Science and Engineering Foundation) [2008-0061123]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0061123] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: The increase in the amount of available protein-protein interaction (PPI) data enables us to develop computational methods for protein complex predictions. A protein complex is a group of proteins that interact with each other at the same time and place. The protein complex generally corresponds to a cluster in PPI network (PPIN). However, clusters correspond not only to protein complexes but also to sets of proteins that interact dynamically with each other. As a result, conventional graph-theoretic clustering methods that disregard interaction dynamics show high false positive rates in protein complex predictions. Results: In this article, a method of re. ning PPIN is proposed that uses the structural interface data of protein pairs for protein complex predictions. A simultaneous protein interaction network ( SPIN) is introduced to specify mutually exclusive interactions (MEIs) as indicated from the overlapping interfaces and to exclude competition from MEIs that arise during the detection of protein complexes. After constructing SPINs, naive clustering algorithms are applied to the SPINs for protein complex predictions. The evaluation results show that the proposed method outperforms the simple PPIN-based method in terms of removing false positive proteins in the formation of complexes. This shows that excluding competition between MEIs can be effective for improving prediction accuracy in general computational approaches involving protein interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据