4.7 Article

Cross-scale, cross-pathway evaluation using an agent-based non-small cell lung cancer model

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 25, 期 18, 页码 2389-2396

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp416

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [113004]
  2. Harvard-MIT (HST) Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging and the Department of Radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a multiscale agent-based non-small cell lung cancer model that consists of a 3D environment with which cancer cells interact while processing phenotypic changes. At the molecular level, transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta) has been integrated into our previously developed in silico model as a second extrinsic input in addition to epidermal growth factor (EGF). The main aim of this study is to investigate how the effects of individual and combinatorial change in EGF and TGF beta concentrations at the molecular level alter tumor growth dynamics on the multi-cellular level, specifically tumor volume and expansion rate. Our simulation results show that separate EGF and TGF beta fluctuations trigger competing multicellular phenotypes, yet synchronous EGF and TGF beta signaling yields a spatially more aggressive tumor that overall exhibits an EGF-driven phenotype. By altering EGF and TGF beta concentration levels simultaneously and asynchronously, we discovered a particular region of EGF-TGF beta profiles that ensures phenotypic stability of the tumor system. Within this region, concentration changes in EGF and TGF beta do not impact the resulting multi-cellular response substantially, while outside these concentration ranges, a change at the molecular level will substantially alter either tumor volume or tumor expansion rate, or both. By evaluating tumor growth dynamics across different scales, we show that, under certain conditions, therapeutic targeting of only one signaling pathway may be insufficient. Potential implications of these in silico results for future clinico-pharmacological applications are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据