4.7 Article

Efficient free energy calculations by variationally optimized metric scaling: Concepts and applications to the volume dependence of cluster free energies and to solid-solid phase transitions

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 113, 期 17, 页码 7035-7046

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1313537

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Finite-time variational switching is an efficient method for obtaining converging upper and lower bounds to free energy changes by computer simulation. Over the course of the simulation, the Hamiltonian is changed continuously between the system of interest and a reference system for which the partition function has an analytic form. The bounds converge most rapidly when the system is kept close to equilibrium throughout the switching. In this paper we introduce the technique of metric scaling to improve adherence to equilibrium and thereby obtain more rapid convergence of the free energy bounds. The method involves scaling the coordinates of the particles, perhaps in a nonuniform way, so as to assist their natural characteristic evolution over the course of the switching. The scaling schedule can be variationally optimized to produce the best convergence of the bounds for a given Hamiltonian switching path. A correction due to the intrinsic work of scaling is made at the end of the calculation. The method is illustrated in a pedagogical one-dimensional example, and is then applied to the volume dependence of cluster free energies, a property of direct relevance to vapor-liquid nucleation theory. Order-of-magnitude improvements in efficiency are obtained in these simple examples. As a contrasting application, we use metric scaling to calculate directly the free energy difference between face-centered-cubic and body-centered-cubic Yukawa crystals. A continuous distortion is applied to the lattice, avoiding the need for separate comparison of the two phases with an independent reference system. (C) 2000 American Institute of Physics. [S0021-9606(00)52441-6].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据