4.7 Article

Homocysteine-thiolactone induces caspase-independent vascular endothelial cell death with apoptotic features

期刊

APOPTOSIS
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 403-411

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009652011466

关键词

apoptosis; atherosclerosis; cell culture; endothelial function; mitochondria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Cell death is generally classified into two large categories: apoptosis, which represents active, physiological programmed cell death, and necrosis, which represents passive cell death without underlying regulatory mechanisms. Apoptosis plays an important role in tissue homeostasis and its role in endothelium integrity can be influenced by the functional status of endothelial cells. Homocysteine, a sulfated amino-acid product of methionine demethylation, is an independent risk factor for vascular disease (arterial and venous thombosis). Our goal was to investigate the thiol-derivatives effect on the endothelial cell apoptosis. Methods. Three parameters were measured: mitochondrial membrane potential using DiOC(6)(3) as the probe, DEVDase activation, and phosphatidylserine exposure on the cell surface with fluorosceinated annexin V labeling which allows apoptosis to be distinguished from necrosis. Results. Homocysteine-thiolactone induced endothelial cell apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner (range: 50-200 muM), independently of the caspase pathway. Only homocysteine-thiolactone, among the thiol derivatives tested, induced apoptosis. Apoptosis was not influenced by the serum concentration in culture medium, suggesting that the observed apoptotic process could occur in vivo. None of the inhibitors used (e.g., leupeptin, fumosinin Bl, catalase, or z-VAD-fmk) was able to prevent homocysteine-induced apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells. Conclusion. The apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells induced by high concentration of homocysteine-thiolactone might be one step atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and contribute to its complication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据