4.2 Article

The evolutionary origins of Epichloe endophytes from annual ryegrasses

期刊

MYCOLOGIA
卷 92, 期 6, 页码 1103-1118

出版社

NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
DOI: 10.2307/3761478

关键词

beta-tubulin gene; interspecific hybridization; Lolium; molecular systematics; Neotyphodium endophytes; rDNA-ITS; symbiosis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The annual Lolium (ryegrass) species were surveyed for seedborne, asexual Epichloe: endophytes (i.e., Neotyphodium spp.). Endophytes that were extremely slow growing in culture were identified from all seven annual ryegrass spp. Sequences of beta -tubulin gene (tu62) introns and the internal transcribed spacers of the nuclear ribosomal RNA (rDNA-ITS) were determined, as were profiles based on five microsatellite loci. Two taxonomic groups of annual ryegrass endophytes were distinguishable by morphology, culturability and genotypes. One group, for which the name Neotyphodium occultans is proposed, comprised only isolates that could not be subcultured on potato dextrose agar medium. These isolates contained multiple tub2 genes and multiple alleles at microsatellite loci, suggestive of an interspecific hybrid origin. The results of phylogenetic analysis implied that the ancestors of N, occultans included Epichloe; baconii and E. bromicola, or close relatives. The second taxonomic group of annual ryegrass endophytes, exemplified by isolate Lc4, was found only in L. canariense. This taxon had a single tub2 sequence and microsatellite genotype that was nearly identical to those of extant Epichloe typhina isolates that infect Poa nemoralis. Therefore, it is proposed that Lc4 is an asexual derivative of an E. typhina genotype closely related to extant strains from P. nemoralis. We propose the name Neotyphodium typhinum var. canariense for this taxon. These two new endophyte taxa from the annual ryegrasses are further examples of asexual Neotyphodium species that have arisen from sexual Epichloe; spp. either directly by loss of the sexual state, or by interspecific hybridization events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据