3.9 Article

Working with families of suddenly and critically ill children -: Physician experiences

期刊

ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
卷 154, 期 11, 页码 1127-1133

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.154.11.1127

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe physicians' experiences in attempting to provide optimal care for families of children who suffer from sudden, acute life-threatening conditions (SALTC). Design: To generate descriptive data in this exploratory study, we used qualitative methods including focus groups and in-depth interviews. Transcripts of focus groups and interviews were analyzed for content using standard phenomenologic analysis methods, which resulted in a participant-generated conceptual model of optimal care for families of children with SALTC. Setting: The intensive care unit of an urban pediatric teaching hospital. Participants: Twenty-two pediatric intensive care unit physicians, including residents, fellows, and attendings. Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measures: Each participating physi- cian provided qualitative descriptions of experiences caring for families of children with SALTC. Results: Physicians identified 4 components of optimal care for families: (1) providing timely, accurate information about their child; (2) maintaining privacy for confidential discussions and personal grieving, (3) giving adequate emotional support; and (4) granting family members the right to hold and comfort their dying child. Physicians also described barriers to, and facilitators of this optimal care. Conclusions: Descriptive information provided in this exploratory study offers a complex model of optimal family care. Issues that affect the quality of care to families include those related to the context of providing care in a large teaching hospital, as well as subtleties of communication between parents and staff. Physicians' beliefs about optimal, care of families in the pediatric intensive care unit revealed implications for both practice and training in pediatrics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据