4.7 Article

Bayesian inference of the sites of perturbations in metabolic pathways via Markov chain Monte Carlo

期刊

BIOINFORMATICS
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 1191-1197

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn103

关键词

-

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/E016065/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C007158/1, BB/E016065/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E016065/1, BB/C007158/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation: Genetic modifications or pharmaceutical interventions can influence multiple sites in metabolic pathways, and often these are distant from the primary effect. In this regard, the ability to identify target and off-target effects of a specific compound or gene therapy is both a major challenge and critical in drug discovery. Results: We applied Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for parameter estimation and perturbation identification in the kinetic modeling of metabolic pathways. Variability in the steady-state measurements in cells taken from a population can be caused by differences in initial conditions within the population, by variation of parameters among individuals and by possible measurement noise. MCMC-based parameter estimation is proposed as a method to help in inferring parameter distributions, taking into account uncertainties in the initial conditions and in the measurement data. The inferred parameter distributions are then used to predict changes in the network via a simple classification method. The proposed technique is applied to analyze changes in the pathways of pyruvate metabolism of mutants of Lactococcus lactis, based on previously published experimental data. Availability: MATLAB code used in the simulations is available from ftp://anonymous@dbkweb.mib.man.ac.uk/pub/Bioinformatics_BJ.zip Contact: bayujw@ieee.org Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据