4.6 Article

Intrinsic A1 adenosine receptor activation during ischemia or reperfusion improves recovery in mouse hearts

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.5.H2166

关键词

contracture; stunning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We assessed the role of A(1) adenosine receptor (A(1)AR) activation by endogenous adenosine in the modulation of ischemic contracture and postischemic recovery in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts subjected to 20 min of total ischemia and 30 min of reperfusion. In control hearts, the rate-pressure product (RPP) and first derivative of pressure development over time (+dP/dt) recovered to 57 +/- 3 and 58 +/- 3% of preischemia, respectively. Diastolic pressure remained elevated at 20 +/- 2 mmHg (compared with 3 +/- 1 mmHg preischemia). Interstitial adenosine, assessed by microdialysis, rose from similar to0.3 to 1.9 muM during ischemia compared with similar to 15 muM in rat heart. Nonetheless, these levels will near maximally activate A(1)ARs on the basis of effects of exogenous adenosine and 2-chloroadenosine. Neither A(1)AR blockade with 200 nM 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) during the ischemic period alone nor A(1)AR activation with 50 nM N-6-cyclopentyladenosine altered rapidity or extent of ischemic contracture. However, ischemic DPCPX treatment significantly depressed postischemic recovery of RPP and +dP/dt (44 +/- 3 and 40 +/- 4% of preischemia, respectively). DPCPX treatment during the reperfusion period alone also reduced recovery of RPP and +dP/dt (to 44 +/- 2 and 47 +/- 2% of preischemia, respectively). These data indicate that 1) interstitial adenosine is lower in mouse versus rat myocardium during ischemia, 2) A(1)AR activation by endogenous adenosine or exogenous agonists does not modify ischemic contracture in murine myocardium, 3) A(1)AR activation by endogenous adenosine during ischemia attenuates postischemic stunning, and 4) A(1)AR activation by endogenous adenosine during the reperfusion period also improves postischemic contractile recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据