4.6 Article

Effects of microtubule disruption on force, velocity, stiffness and [Ca2+]i in porcine coronary arteries

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.279.5.H2493

关键词

coronary artery; isometric force; nocodazole; taxol

资金

  1. PHS HHS [23240] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Force generated by smooth muscle cells is believed to result from the interaction of actin and myosin filaments and is regulated through phosphorylation of the myosin regulatory light chain (LC20). The role of other cytoskeleton filaments, such as microtubules and intermediate filaments, in determining the mechanical output of smooth muscle is unclear. In cultured fibroblasts, microtubule disruption results in large increases in force similar to contractions associated with LC20 phosphorylation (15). One hypothesis, the tensegrity or push-pull model, attributes this increase in force to the disruption of microtubules functioning as rigid struts to resist force generated by actin-myosin interaction (9). In porcine coronary arteries, the disruption of microtubules by nocodazole (11 muM) also elicited moderate but significant increases in isometric force (10-40% of a KCl contracture), which could be blocked or reversed by taxol (a microtubule stabilizer). We tested whether this nocodazole-induced force was accompanied by changes in coronary artery stiffness or unloaded shortening velocity, parameters likely to be highly sensitive to microtubule resistance elements. Few changes were seen, ruling out push-pull mechanisms for the increase in force by nocodazole. In contrast, the intracellular calcium concentration, measured by fura 2 in the intact artery, was increased by nocodazole in parallel with force, and this was inhibited and/or reversed by taxol. Our results indicate that microtubules do not significantly contribute to vascular smooth muscle mechanical characteristics but, importantly, may play a role in modulation of Ca2+ signal transduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据