4.6 Article

Statins and cardiovascular diseases: the multiple effects of lipid-lowering therapy by statins

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 153, 期 1, 页码 181-189

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9150(00)00397-X

关键词

statin; hyperlipidemia; thrombosis; endothelium; atherosclerosis

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [5 MO1 RR 00071] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P50 HL54469] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cholesterol lowering involving different therapies improves the clinical outcome of patients. To define the underlying pathomechanism, we studied whether treatment with statins was associated with changes in blood thrombogenicity, endothelial dysfunction and soluble adhesion molecule levels. Fifty hypercholesterolemic patients were treated with pravastatin (40 mg/day, n = 24) or simvastatin (20 mg/day, n = 26). Lipid profile and blood thrombogenicity were assessed in all patients before and after 3 months of cholesterol reducing therapy. Blood thrombogenicity was assessed as thrombus formation, perfusing non-anticoagulated blood directly from the patients' vein through the Badimon perfusion chamber (shear rate 1690/s). Endothelial-dependent vasomotor response was tested by laser-Doppler flowmeter. Soluble adhesion molecule level were measured by ELISA. Total and LDL cholesterol were reduced ill the two treatment groups by statin therapy. Statin therapy was associated with a significant reduction in blood thrombogenicity and endothelium-dependent vasoresponse. No differences were observed between simvastatin or pravastatin treatment. Lipid lowering by statins had no effect on plasma levels of fibrinogen, sl-selectin, sP-selectin and sICAM-I antigen. Cholesterol lowering by both statins reduced the increased blood reactivity and endothelial dysfunction present under hypercholesterolemia. The multiple effects of lipid lowering therapy by statins may explain the benefits observed in recent epidemiological trials. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据