4.3 Article

Emotion and pulmonary function in asthma: Reactivity in the field and relationship with laboratory induction of emotion

期刊

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
卷 62, 期 6, 页码 808-815

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006842-200011000-00011

关键词

emotion; asthma; respiratory resistance; lung function diaries; laboratory-field comparison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We investigated the modulation of pulmonary function by mood states in the daily life of asthmatic patients and nonasthmatic control subjects and its relationship to the airway effects of laboratory induction of emotion using films. Methods: Twenty asthmatic patients and 20 nonasthmatic control subjects participated in a laboratory session in which various emotions (ie, anxiety, anger, depression, happiness, elation, contentment, and neutrality) were induced by films. Respiratory resistance (R-os) was measured by forced oscillation. After this session, participants kept mood diaries, including regular spirometric self-assessments, for at least 3 weeks. Episodes of strong negative or positive mood were selected from these diaries and compared with conditions of relative affective neutrality. Results: In asthmatic patients, negative mood states, and to a lesser degree positive mood states, were associated with a reduction in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV,) compared with neutral states. These effects were not observed in nonasthmatic control subjects. Self-reports of arousal varied in a reciprocal manner with FEV,, whereas physical activity did not vary systematically between mood episodes. A moderate negative relationship between changes in FEV, during negative mood episodes and changes in R-os during viewing of the depressing film was also observed in asthmatic patients. Conclusion: Pulmonary function of asthmatic patients is negatively affected by strong mood states in daily life. Airway effects of negative emotion induction, particularly depression, can predict changes in pulmonary function in response to negative mood in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据