4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Cardiovascular and sympathetic effects of L-glutamate and glycine injected into the rostral ventrolateral medulla of conscious rats

期刊

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 633-641

出版社

JAPANESE SOC HYPERTENSION CENT ACADEMIC SOC, PUBL OFFICE
DOI: 10.1291/hypres.23.633

关键词

amino acids; arterial pressure; heart rate; renal sympathetic nerve activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of L-glutamate and glycine microinjected into the rostral ventrolateral medulla(RVLM) in conscious unrestrained rats. Microinjection of 2 nmoI of L-glutamate increased the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) in the conscious rats. The RSNA responses were significantly larger in the conscious rats than in anesthetized rats, while the magnitude of the presser responses was similar in conscious and urethane anesthetized rats. L-Glutamate injection significantly decreased heart rate in the conscious rats, whereas it increased the heart rate slightly but not significantly in the anesthetized rats. Microinjection of 100 nmol of glycine into the RVLM of conscious rat decreased MAP and RSNA. In 2 of the 6 rats examined, the depressor and sympathoinhibitory responses were preceded by a few seconds of a presser and sympathoexcitatory phase, The decreases of RSNA in response to glycine injection were significantly larger in the conscious rats than in the anesthetized rats, whereas the magnitude of the depressor responses was similar in the two groups of rats. Heart rate decreased in response to glycine injection into the RVLM in the conscious and the anesthetized rats. In conclusion, in conscious unrestrained rats, as well as in urethane-anesthetized rats, L-glutamate acts as a sympathoexcitatory agent and glycine acts as a sympathoinhibitory agent in the RVLM. The sympathetic responses to these amino acids are larger in conscious rats than in anesthetized rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据