4.3 Article

MR characteristics and histological correlation in the young pig

期刊

CLINICAL IMAGING
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 371-380

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-7071(00)00248-5

关键词

bone marrow, MR; bone marrow, edema; trauma; magnetic resonance(MR), experimental

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To correlate magnetic resonance (MR) signal characteristics of bone bruises with histological findings. Materials and methods: In 14 tibiae of young pigs, bone bruises were created in the proximal tibial metaphysis. The signal intensity seen on the MR images were correlated with histological findings. The following findings were evaluated: (a) changes of signal intensity on the tibiae; (b) changes of histology on the tibiae; and (c) changes of (a) and (b) on follow-up examinations. Results: We observed three types of injuries on T1-weighted images: focal or diffuse low signal, normal signal and linear low signal intensities. Severe hemorrhagic areas showed low signal intensities on all sequences of MR imaging. Fast spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted images showed a more distinct low signal intensity than T1-weighted images. FSE short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and FSE fat saturated (FSE-FS) T2-weighted images showed similar signal intensities with FSE T2-weighted images. FS T1-weighted enhanced images showed low signal intensities with variable enhancements. Upon histological examination, hemorrhages and edemas were prominent at the subcortical areas of the contusion sites. The areas of dense, low signal intensities in all imaging sequences showed signs of severe hemorrhage. The areas of diffuse low signal and enhanced areas showed mixed areas of hemorrhages and edemas. Follow-up MR imaging showed evolution of the processes of hemorrhages and edemas with fatty marrow changes. Conclusions: MR imaging can depict changes in the bone marrow resulting from direct injury to the bone. MR imaging is a useful tool for evaluating the evolution of bone bruises. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据