4.6 Article

Relationship between phosphorus and creatinine clearance in peritoneal dialysis: Clinical implications

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 1020-1024

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2000.19105

关键词

phosphorus; peritoneal equilibration test (PET); residual renal function; peritoneal dialysis (PD); creatinine clearance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated serum phosphorus levels are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. To study the determinants of serum phosphorus levels and phosphorus clearance, we measured phosphorus concentrations in 24-hour collections of dialysate and residual urine output during routine urea kinetics in 56 peritoneal dialysis patients. Dietary records were used to estimate oral phosphorus intake, and the net gastrointestinal absorption of phosphorus was determined measuring the amount of phosphorus excreted in 24 hours. Dialysate to plasma ratios of phosphorus and creatinine were very similar, and the peritoneal clearances of phosphorus and creatinine correlated well and were of the same magnitude, High transporters in the peritoneal equilibration test had greater phosphorus and creatinine clearances than low transporters. In patients with residual urine output, the renal clearances of phosphorus and creatinine also correlated well. Comparing two groups of patients with a similar KW of 2 and greater but different levels of creatinine clearance, either greater or less than 60 L/wk, the patients with the greater creatinine clearance also had a greater phosphorus clearance (7.0 +/- 2.2 versus 4.3 +/- 0.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and significantly lower serum phosphorus revels (4.8 +/- 0.9 versus 5.9 +/- 1.4 mg/dL) despite a greater daily amount of phosphorus absorption (490 +/- 190 Versus 336 +/- 100 mg/d). In summary, creatinine clearance measurements provide a good estimate of phosphorus clearance and how much: dietary phosphorus and therefore protein can be tolerated. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据