4.7 Article

Context-dependent EKLF responsiveness defines the developmental specificity of the human ε-globin gene in erythroid cells of YAC transgenic mice

期刊

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 2778-2794

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.822500

关键词

globin; switching; transgenic; YAC; EKLF; DRED

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA60553, P30 CA060553] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL024415, HL24415] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK052356-04, R01 DK052356] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explored the mechanism of definitive-stage epsilon -globin transcriptional inactivity within a human beta -globin YAC expressed in transgenic mice. We focused on the globin CAC and CAAT promoter motifs, as previous laboratory and clinical studies indicated a pivotal role for these elements in globin gene activation. A high-affinity CAC-binding site for the erythroid kruppel-like factor (EKLF) was placed in the E-globin promoter at a position corresponding to that in the adult beta -globin promoter, thereby simultaneously ablating a direct repeat (DR) element. This mutation led to EKLF-independent epsilon -globin transcription during definitive erythropoiesis. A second 4-bp substitution in the epsilon -globin CAAT sequence, which simultaneously disrupts a second DR element, further enhanced ectopic definitive erythroid activation of epsilon -globin transcription, which surprisingly became EKLF dependent. We finally examined factors in nuclear extracts prepared from embryonic or adult erythroid cells that bound these elements in vitro, and we identified a novel DR-binding protein (DRED) whose properties are consistent with those expected for a definitive-stage epsilon -globin repressor. We conclude that the suppression of epsilon -globin transcription during definitive erythropoiesis is mediated by the binding of a repressor that prevents EKLF from activating the epsilon -globin gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据