3.8 Article

Calculations of mixing enthalpy and mismatch entropy for ternary amorphous alloys

期刊

MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS JIM
卷 41, 期 11, 页码 1372-1378

出版社

JAPAN INST METALS
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1989.41.1372

关键词

mixing enthalpy; mismatch entropy; amorphous alloy; ternary system; amorphous-forming ability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical mixing enthalpy (DeltaH(Chem)) and mismatch entropy normalized by Boltzmann constant (S-sigma/k(B)) corresponding to the three empirical rules for the achievement of high amorphous-forming ability (AFA) were calculated with thermodynamical functions for the gross number of 6450 alloys in 351 ternary amorphous systems. The ternary amorphous alloys have DeltaH(chem) Of -86 to 25 kJ/mol and S-sigma/k(B) of 1.8 x 10(-3) to 5.7. The average values of DeltaH(chem) and S-sigma/k(B) are calculated to be -33 J/mol and 0.33, respectively. The 30 alloys in 9 ternary amorphous systems including 10 alloys in Ag-Cu-Fe system have positive values of DeltaH(chem). Most of the ternary amorphous alloys have the values of DeltaH(chem) and S-sigma/k(B) inside a trapezoid region in DeltaH(chem) - log(S-sigma/k(B)) chart except mainly for the H- and the C-containing alloys, Si-W-Zr system and the 32 alleys having positive values of DeltaH(chem). The analysis of AFA was carried out for typical five ternary amorphous systems. The following four results are derived. 1)Al-La-Ni and B-Fe-Zr alloys have high AFA in accordance with the concept of the three empirical rules. 2) The further multiplication of alloy components causes an increase in the AFA of Al-B-Fe alloys. 3) Thermodynamical factors represented by melting temperature and viscosity at the melting temperature are required for evaluation of AFA for Mg- and Pd-based amorphous alloys. 4) A tendency for log(S-sigma/k(B)) to increase with decreasing DeltaH(chem) is recognized in each alloys system, implying the stabilization of an amorphous phase against solid solution and intermediate phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据