4.6 Article

Elevated air carbon dioxide concentrations increase dissolved carbon leaching from a cropland soil

期刊

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
卷 108, 期 1-3, 页码 135-148

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-011-9584-0

关键词

Free air carbon dioxide enrichment; Dissolved organic carbon; Dissolved inorganic carbon; Net biome productivity; Net ecosystem carbon balance; Carbon sequestration

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [SI 1106/2-1]
  2. German Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV)
  3. Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY, USA
  4. Institute of Biodiversity of the Johann Heinrich von Thunen-Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing leaching losses of carbon from soils due to accelerated weathering and increasing concentrations of dissolved carbon as a result of intensified soil respiration are suspected to provide a negative feedback on rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations. We tested this hypothesis by studying concentrations of dissolved carbon and groundwater recharge at the Braunschweig free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) experiment under winter wheat and winter barley. Dissolved carbon concentrations under elevated atmospheric CO2 and ambient conditions were rather similar and not consistently higher under FACE. An analysis of delta C-13 signatures suggested that dissolved organic and inorganic carbon contained 9-29% (DOC) and 26-49% (DIC) of new carbon originating from CO2 added to the FACE rings. Dissolved inorganic carbon additionally contained 15-42% of carbonate-derived C. A 15% reduction in evapotranspiration under elevated CO2 increased groundwater recharge by 60 mm or 55%, which was the main driver for an observed 81% increase in dissolved carbon leaching from 2.7 to 4.9 g C m(-2) year(-1) at 90 cm depth. Our results suggest that future changes of dissolved carbon leaching losses will be mainly governed by changes in climate and groundwater recharge and to a lesser extent by increasing dissolved carbon concentrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据