4.5 Article

Highly sensitive luciferase reporter assay using a potent destabilization sequence of calpain 3

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 115-123

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.12.004

关键词

Luciferase; Destabilization sequence; Calpain 3; Real-time monitoring

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development (NEDO), Japan [P06040]
  2. ARCH-Tox project from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reporter assays that use luciferases are widely employed for monitoring cellular events associated with gene expression in vitro and in vivo. To improve the response of the luciferase reporter to acute changes of gene expression, a destabilization sequence is frequently used to reduce the stability of luciferase protein in the cells, which results in an increase of sensitivity of the luciferase reporter assay. In this study, we identified a potent destabilization sequence (referred to as the C9 fragment) consisting of 42 amino acid residues from human calpain 3 (CAPN3). Whereas the half-life of Emerald Luc (ELuc) from the Brazilian click beetle Pyrearinus termitilluminans was reduced by fusing PEST (t(1/2) = 9.8 to 2.8 h), the half-life of C9-fused ELuc was significantly shorter (t(1/2) = 1.0 h) than that of PEST-fused ELuc when measurements were conducted at 37 degrees C. In addition, firefly luciferase (luc2) was also markedly destabilized by the C9 fragment compared with the humanized PEST sequence. These results indicate that the C9 fragment from CAPN3 is a much more potent destabilization sequence than the PEST sequence. Furthermore, real-time bioluminescence recording of the activation kinetics of nuclear factor-kappa B after transient treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha revealed that the response of C9-fused ELuc is significantly greater than that of PEST-fused ELuc, demonstrating that the use of the C9 fragment realizes a luciferase reporter assay that has faster response speed compared with that provided by the PEST sequence. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据