4.6 Article

Controls on the origin and cycling of riverine dissolved inorganic carbon in the Brazos River, Texas

期刊

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
卷 104, 期 1-3, 页码 275-291

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-010-9501-y

关键词

Carbon cycle; Dissolved inorganic carbon; Lithology; pCO(2); River system

资金

  1. Texas Water Resources Institute
  2. U.S. Geological Survey
  3. National Institutes for Water Research
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0928941] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rivers draining watersheds that include carbonate bedrock or organic matter (OM)-rich sedimentary rocks frequently have C-14-depleted dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) relative to rivers draining carbonate- and OM-free watersheds, due to dissolution of carbonate and/or decomposition of ancient OM. However, our results from a subtropical river, the Brazos River in Texas, USA, show that in this watershed human activities appear to dominate basin lithology in controlling the origin and metabolism of DIC. The middle Brazos flows through limestone and coal-bearing bedrock, but DIC isotope data suggest no limestone dissolution or respiration of ancient OM, and instead reflect efficient air-water CO2 exchange, degradation of relatively young OM and photosynthesis in the river as a result of river damming and urban treated wastewater input. The lower Brazos drains only small areas of carbonate and coal-bearing bedrock, but DIC isotope data suggest the strong influence of carbonate dissolution, with a potentially minor contribution from decomposition of old soil organic matter (SOM). Oyster shells and crushed carbonate minerals used in road construction are likely sources of carbonate in the lower Brazos, in addition to natural marl and pedogenic carbonate. Additionally, the generally low pCO(2) and high DIC concentration in the Brazos River lead to a low CO2 outgassing:DIC export ratio, distinguishing the Brazos River from other rivers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据