4.6 Article

A worldwide view of organic carbon export from catchments

期刊

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
卷 107, 期 1-3, 页码 275-293

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-010-9553-z

关键词

Controlling factors; Climatic regions; Biomes; In-stream processes; Stoichiometry; Nitrogen; Phosphorus

资金

  1. National Parks' Network of the Spanish Ministry of the Environment [81/2005, 001/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing interest in the effects of global change on the metabolism, stoichiometry and cycling of carbon in aquatic ecosystems has motivated research on the export of organic carbon (OCE) from catchments. In this article, quantitative and functional features of the annual export rates of total, particulate and dissolved organic carbon (TOC, POC and DOC) were reviewed, and the stoichiometry of export (OC:N, OC:P and N:P) from 550 catchments worldwide was reported. TOC export ranged 2.1-92,474 kg C km(-2) year(-1), POC export ranged 0.4-73,979 kg C km(-2) year(-1) and DOC export ranged 1.2-56,946 kg C km(-2) year(-1). Exports of TOC and DOC were strongly linked, but POC export was unrelated to DOC. The DOC fraction comprised on average 73 +/- A 21% of TOC export. The export rates of organic carbon were poorly related to those of total nitrogen and total phosphorus. Discrete and continuous environmental variables failed to predict TOC export, but DOC export was influenced by discharge and catchment area worldwide. Models of OCE in different catchment types were controlled by different environmental variables; hydrological variables were generally better predictors of OCE than anthropogenic and soil variables. Elemental ratios of carbon export in most catchments were above the Redfield ratio, suggesting that phosphorus may become the limiting nutrient for downstream plant growth. These ratios were marginally related to environmental data. More detailed hydrological data, consideration of in-stream processes and the use of quasi-empirical dynamical models are advocated to improve our knowledge of OCE rates and those of other nutrients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据