3.8 Article

Technetium-99m RP527, a GRP analogue for visualisation of GRP receptor-expressing malignancies: a feasibility study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 1694-1699

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s002590000355

关键词

technetium-99m RP527; GRP receptor; feasibility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptor scintigraphy could allow prediction of response to GRP receptor-targeted treatment options, early non-invasive diagnosis and in vivo prognostic stratification of GRP receptor-positive tumours. This study reports on the imaging characteristics and efficacy for tumour detection of technetium-99m RP527, a Tc-99m chelated targeting peptide derived from bombesin, which binds GRP receptors with high affinity. Ten patients (four men and six women, mean age 56.4 years) either suffering from metastasised prostate (n, number of patients = 4) or breast carcinoma (n=1) or presenting with a clinical diagnosis high ly suggestive for breast carcinoma (n=5) were included in the study. In the latter five patients, Tc-99m-RP527 scintigraphy was performed prior to diagnostic, e.g. biopsy, and staging examinations. Final diagnosis in these patients was breast carcinoma in all five. In all patients, whole-body planar scans and tomographic images were acquired 1 h and 5-6 h post injection of 555 MBq Tc-99m-RP527 and tumour to normal tissue (T/N) ratios determined. Tc-99m-RP527 showed specific uptake in four of six breast and one of four prostate carcinomas. T/N ratios derived from planar and tomographic images increased significantly (P<0.01) from 1.65 (SD 1.53) and 3.35 (SD 3.04) to 2.58 (SD 1.26) and 7.23 (SD 8.46), respectively. T/N ratios derived from tomographic images were consistently higher (P<0.01). The data presented suggest that Tc-99m-RP527 results in specific tumour localisation and exhibits good imaging characteristics with a good T/N ratio that may be further enhanced by single-photon emission tomography.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据