4.7 Article

Fluid flow induces upregulation of synthesis and release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in vitro

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.20.11.2474

关键词

tissue factor pathway inhibitor; shear stress; flow; endothelial cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluid flow modulates the synthesis and secretion by endothelial cells (ECs) of several proteins that control the hemostatic properties of the vessel wall. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), also synthesized by ECs, is the main downregulator of tissue factor-dependent procoagulant activity. In the present study, we investigated the effect of physiological shear stress on the expression, distribution, and release of TFPI in cultured ECs. The EA.hy926 cell line was grown in a hollow-fiber perfusion system and exposed for variable times to different shear values: 0.27 dyne/cm(2) (minimal flow), 4.1 dyne/cm(2) (venous flow), and 19 dyne/cm(2) (moderate arterial flow). Step increase of the shear stress from 0.27 to 19 dyne/cm(2) induced a sharp increase of TFPI released into the medium and a parallel decrease and redistribution of cell-associated TFPI, which suggests that an acute release of TFPI occurred from the cellular pools. During 24 hours of high shear stress, cell-associated TFPI antigen and mRNA increased time-dependently. Subjecting ECs to steady shear stress for 72 hours also upregulated the expression and production of TFPI, in direct correlation with the degree of the shear. The secretion of TFPI was enhanced 1.9-fold under venous flow and 2.4-fold under arterial flow compared with minimal flow. Equally, cell-associated TFPI antigen and cell surface TFPI activity increased proportionally with the shear stress. The expression of TFPI mRNA, as determined by Northern blotting, increased up to 2-fold in ECs under venous flow and up to 3-fold under arterial flow. These results suggest that shear forces regulate TFPI by modulating its release and gene expression in ECs in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据