4.5 Article

Product developments in the bio-based chemicals arena

期刊

BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 606-624

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1360

关键词

lactic acid; succinic acid; ethylene; furan dicarboxylic acid; sorbitol; levulinic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Around the world, significant able steps are being taken to move from today's fossil-based economy to a more sustainable economy based on biomass. A key factor in the realization of a successful bio-based economy will be the development of biorefinery systems allowing highly efficient and cost-effective processing of biological feedstocks to a range of bio-based products, and successful integration into existing infrastructure. The recent climb in oil prices and consumer demand for environmentally friendly products has now opened new windows of opportunity for bio-based chemicals and polymers. Industry is increasingly viewing chemical and polymer production from renewable resources as an attractive area for investment. Within the bio-based economy and the operation of a biorefinery, there are significant opportunities for the development of bio-based building blocks (chemicals and polymers) and materials (fiber products, starch derivatives, etc). In many cases this happens in conjunction with the production of bioenergy or biofuels. The production of bio-based products could generate US$10-15 billion of revenue for the global chemical industry. The economic production of biofuels is often a challenge. The co-production of chemicals, materials food and feed can generate the necessary added value. This paper highlights all bio-based chemicals with immediate potential as biorefinery 'value added products'. The selected products are either demonstrating strong market growth or have significant industry investment in development and demonstration programs. The full IEA Bioenergy Task 42 report is available from http://www.iea-bioenergy.task42-biorefineries.com (C) Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据