4.5 Article

Brain atrophy and neuronal loss in alcoholism: a role for DNA damage?

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 37, 期 5-6, 页码 403-412

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-0186(00)00051-6

关键词

oxidative damage; DNA repair; lipid peroxidation; acetaldehyde; neurodegeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic alcohol abuse has deleterious effects on several organs in the body including the brain. Neuroradiological studies have demonstrated that the brains of chronic alcoholics undergo loss of both gray and white matter volumes. Neuropathological studies using unbiased stereological methods have provided evidence for loss of neurons in specific parts of the brain in chronic alcoholics. The purpose of this paper is to propose a mechanism for this alcohol related neuronal loss. The hypothesis is based on the neurodegeneration observed in patients with the genetic disorder xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), who lack the capacity to carry out a specific type of DNA repair called nucleotide excision repair (NER). Some XP patients develop a progressive atrophic neurodegeneration, termed XP neurological disease, indicating that endogenous DNA damage that is normally repaired by NER has the capacity to cause neuronal death. Accumulating evidence indicates that the neurodegenerative DNA damage that is responsible for neuronal loss in XP patients results from reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation products, and has the capacity to inhibit gene expression by RNA polymerase II. Therefore, the following model is proposed: chronic alcohol abuse results in increased levels of ROS and lipid peroxidation products in neurons, which results in an overwhelming burden on the NER pathway, and increased steady state levels of DNA lesions that inhibit gene expression. This results in neuronal death either by reduction in the levels of essential gene products or by apoptosis. The implications of this model for future studies are discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据