4.6 Article

Glucosylceramide synthase does not attenuate the ceramide pool accumulating during apoptosis induced by CD95 or anti-cancer regimens

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 44, 页码 34810-34817

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M005142200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ceramide (Cer) accumulating during the execution phase of apoptosis is generated from plasma membrane sphingomyelin (SM), which gains access to a sphingomyelinase due to phospholipid scrambling (Tepper, A. D., Ruurs, P., Wiedmer T., Sims, P., Borst, J., and van Blitterswijk W. J. (2000) J. Cell. Biol; 150, 155-164), To evaluate the functional significance of this Cer pool, we aimed to convert it to glucosylceramide (GlcCer), by constitutive overexpression of glucosylceramide synthase (GCS). Jurkat cells, retrovirally transduced with GCS cDNA, showed a 10-12-fold increase in GCS activity in vitro and a 7-fold elevated basal GlcCer level in vivo. However, Cer accumulating during apoptosis induced by ligation of the death receptor CD95, treatment with the anti-cancer drug etoposide, or exposure to gamma -radiation was not glycosylated by GCS. Likewise, Cer liberated at the plasma membrane by bacterial SMase was not concerted by the enzyme. Thus, GCS, located at the Golgi, is topologically segregated from Cer produced in the plasma membrane. In contrast, de novo synthesized Cer as well as an exogenously supplied cell-permeable Cer analog were efficiently glycosylated, apparently due to different. Cer topology and distinct physicochemical behavior of the synthetic Cer species, respectively. Exogenous cell-permeable Cer species, despite their conversion by GCS, effectively induced apoptosis. We also observed that GCS activity is down-regulated in cells undergoing apoptosis. In conclusion, GCS can convert de novo synthesized Cer but not SM-derived Cer, and, therefore, the ability of GCS overexpression to protect cells ii om possible detrimental effects of Cer accumulation is limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据