4.5 Article

Functional plasticity in extrastriate visual cortex following neonatal visual cortex damage and monocular enucleation

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 882, 期 1-2, 页码 241-250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02902-4

关键词

posteromedial lateral suprasylvian; plasticity; visual cortex damage; X-pathway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonatal lesions of primary visual cortex (areas 17, 18 and 19; VC) in cats lead to significant changes in the organization of visual pathways, including severe retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells of the X/beta class. Cells in posteromedial lateral suprasylvian (PMLS) cortex display plasticity in that they develop normal receptive-field properties despite these changes, but they do not acquire the response properties of striate neurons that were damaged (e.g., high spatial-frequency tuning, low contrast threshold). One possibility is that the loss of X-pathway information, which is thought to underlie striate cortical properties in normal animals, precludes the acquisition of these responses by cells in remaining brain areas following neonatal VC damage. Previously, we have shown that monocular enucleation at the time of VC lesion prevents the X-/beta -cell loss in the remaining eye. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether this sparing of retinal X-cells leads to the development of striate-like response properties in PMLS cortex. We recorded the responses of PMLS neurons to visual stimuli to assess spatial-frequency tuning, spatial resolution, and contrast threshold. Results indicated that some PMLS cells in animals with a neonatal VC lesion and monocular enucleation displayed a preference for higher spatial frequencies, had higher spatial resolution, and had lower contrast thresholds than PMLS cells in cats with VC lesion alone. Taken together, these results suggest that preserving X-pathway input during this critical period leads to the addition of some X-like properties to PMLS visual responses. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据