4.6 Article

Peroxynitrite-An ugly biofactor?

期刊

BIOFACTORS
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 264-273

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/biof.103

关键词

peroxynitrite; biomedical aspects; peroxynitrite scavenging; nitrogen monoxide; nitro-tyrosine; superoxide; S-nitrosothiols

资金

  1. Ministry for Health of Italy
  2. Telethon, AIRC
  3. Fondazione Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular damage occurring under oxidative conditions has been ascribed mainly to the formation of peroxynitrite (ONOOH/ONOO-) that originates from the reaction of NO center dot with O-2(center dot-). The detrimental effects of peroxynitrite are exacerbated by the reaction with CO2 that leads to ONOOC(O)O-, which further decays to the strong oxidant radicals NO2 center dot and CO3 center dot-. The reaction with CO2, however, may redirect peroxynitrite specificity. An excessive formation of peroxynitrite represents an important mechanism contributing to the DNA damage, the inactivation of metabolic enzymes, ionic pumps, and structural proteins, and the disruption of cell membranes. Because of its ability to oxidize biomolecules, peroxynitrite is implicated in an increasing list of diseases, including neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disorders, inflammation, pain, autoimmunity, cancer, and aging. However, peroxynitrite displays also protective activities: (i) at high concentrations, it shows antiviral, anti-microbial, and anti-parasitic actions; and (ii) at low concentrations, it stimulates protective mechanisms in the cardiovascular, nervous, and respiratory systems. The detrimental effects of peroxynitrite and related reactive species are impaired by (pseudo-) enzymatic systems, mainly represented by heme-proteins (e.g., hemoglobin and myoglobin). Here, we report biochemical aspects of peroxynitrite actions being at the root of its biomedical effects. (C) 2010 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Volume 36, Number 4, July/August 2010, Pages 264-273 . E-mail: ascenzi@uniroma3.it

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据