4.8 Article

Mental stress induces transient endothelial dysfunction in humans

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 102, 期 20, 页码 2473-2478

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.20.2473

关键词

endothelium; atherosclerosis; mental stress; diabetes mellitus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Mental stress has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality in coronary artery disease and to atherosclerosis progression. Experimental studies have suggested that damage to the endothelium may be an important mechanism. Methods and Results-Endothelial function was studied in 10 healthy men (aged 50.4+/-9.6 years) and in 8 non-insulin-dependent diabetic men (aged 52.0+/-7.2 years). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD, endothelium dependent) and response to 50 mug of sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, endothelium independent) were measured noninvasively by use of high-resolution ultrasound before and after (30, 90, and 240 minutes) a standardized mental stress test. The same protocol without mental stress was repeated on a separate occasion in the healthy men. In healthy subjects, FMD (5.0+/-2.1%) was significantly (P<0.01) reduced at 30 and 90 minutes after mental stress (2.8+/-2.3% and 2.3+/-2.4%, respectively) and returned toward normal after 4 hours (4.1+/-2.0%). Mental stress had no effect on the response to GTN. In the repeated studies without mental stress, FMD did not change. The diabetic subjects had lower FMD than did the control subjects (3.0+/-1.5% versus 5.0+/-2.1%, respectively; P=0.02) but showed no changes in FMD (2.7+/-1.1% after 30 minutes, 2.8+/-1.9% after 90 minutes, and 3.1+/-2.3% after 240 minutes) or GTN responses after mental stress, Conclusions-These findings suggest that brief episodes of mental stress, similar to those encountered in everyday life, may cause transient (up to 4 hours) endothelial dysfunction in healthy young individuals. This might represent a mechanistic link between mental stress and atherogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据