4.6 Article

Regular aerobic exercise modulates age-associated declines in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in healthy men

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 529, 期 1, 页码 263-271

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00263.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AG000847] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG006537, R01 AG013038, AG13038, AG06537, AG16071, R37 AG013038] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), the arterial baroreflex-mediated change in the R-R interval per unit change in systolic blood pressure, decreases with advancing age in sedentary adult humans. We determined the effects of regular aerobic exercise on the age-related decline in cardiovagal BRS. 2. In the cross-sectional study, 133 healthy men 18-79 years of age who were either sedentary performing moderate aerobic exercise, or endurance exercise trained were studied. Among the sedentary men, cardiovagal BRS (phase IV of Valsalva's manoeuvre) was progressively lower (P < 0.05) in the middle-aged (33%) and older (similar to 60%) groups compared with the young group. In contrast, cardiovagal BRS was similar in the young and middle-aged men in the moderate exercise and endurance-trained groups. Cardiovagal BRS was lower (P < 0.05) in the older exercising men, but the magnitude of decline across age (30%) was only half as great as that in sedentary men. Cardiovagal BRS was 40-75% greater (P < 0.05) in middle-aged and older men who exercised regularly compared with their sedentary peers. 3. In the intervention study, a 3 month aerobic exercise intervention (primarily walking) increased cardiovagal BRS by an average of 25% (P < 0.05) in 13 previously sedentary middle-aged and older (56 +/- 1 years) healthy men. 4. Our results demonstrate for the first time that regular aerobic exercise: (1) attenuates the age-associated decline in cardiovagal BRS; and (2) partially restores the loss of cardiovagal BRS in previously sedentary middle-aged and older healthy men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据