4.6 Article

The role of mitochondria in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 expression during hypoxia

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 46, 页码 35863-35867

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M005643200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 56470] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS37111, NS 38632] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) is a heterodimeric transcription factor that regulates transcriptional activation of several genes responsive to the lack of oxygen, including erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor, glycolytic enzymes, and glucose transporters. Because the involvement of mitochondria in the regulation of HIF-1 has been postulated, we tested the effects of mitochondrial electron transport chain deficiency on HIF-1 protein expression and DNA binding in hypoxic cells. The neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) inhibits electron transport chain at the level of complex I. MPTP is first converted to a pharmacologically active metabolite 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinum (MPP+). MPP+ effectively inhibited both complex I activity and hypoxic accumulation of HIF-1 alpha protein in dopaminergic cell lines PC12 and CATH.a, In C57BL/6 mice, a single dose of MPTP (15 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) inhibited complex I activity and HIF-1 alpha protein accumulation in the striatum in response to a subsequent hypoxic challenge (8% O-2, 4 h). In a genetic model system, 40% complex I-inhibited human-ape xe-nomitochondrial cybrids, hypoxic induction of HIF-1 alpha was severely reduced, and HIF-1 DNA binding was diminished. However, succinate, the mitochondrial complex II substrate, restored the hypoxic response in cybrid cells, suggesting that electron transport chain activity is required for activation of HIF-1. A partial complex I deficiency and a mild reduction in intact cell oxygen consumption effectively prevented hypoxic induction of HIF-1 alpha protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据