4.7 Article

Soluble epoxide hydrolase regulates hydrolysis of vasoactive epoxyeicosatrienoic acids

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 11, 页码 992-998

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.87.11.992

关键词

epoxyeicosatrienoic acids dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acids; cytochrome P450; soluble epoxide hydrolase; hypertension

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R29 HL53994] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES02710, F32 ES05808] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cytochrome P450-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) have potent effects on renal vascular reactivity and tubular sodium and water transport; however, the role of these eicosanoids in the pathogenesis of hypertension is controversial. The current study examined the hydrolysis of the EETs to the corresponding dihydroxyeicosatrienoic acids (DHETs) as a mechanism for regulation of EET activity and blood pressure. EET hydrolysis was increased 5- to 54-fold in renal cortical S9 fractions from the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) relative to the normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rat. This increase was most significant for the 14,15-EET regioisomer, and there was a clear preference for hydrolysis of 14,15-EET over the 8,9- and 11,12-EETs. Increased EET hydrolysis was consistent with increased expression of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) in the SHR renal microsomes and cytosol relative to the WKY samples. The urinary excretion of 14,15-DHET was 2.6-fold higher in the SHR than in the WKY rat, confirming increased EET hydrolysis in the SHR in vivo. Blood pressure was decreased 22+/-4 mm Hg (P<0.01) 6 hours after treatment of SHRs with the selective sEH inhibitor N,N'-dicyclohexylurea; this treatment had no effect on blood pressure in the WKY rat. These studies identify sEH as a novel therapeutic target for control of blood pressure. The identification of a potent and selective inhibitor of EET hydrolysis will be invaluable in separating the vascular effects of the EET and DHET eicosanoids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据