4.4 Article

Distinctive cognate sequence discrimination, bound DNA conformation, and binding modes in the E2 C-terminal domains from prototype human and bovine papillomaviruses

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 47, 页码 14692-14701

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi001694r

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The C-terminal DNA binding domain of the E2 protein is involved in transcriptional regulation and DNA replication in papillomaviruses. At low ionic strength, the domain has a tendency to form aggregates, a process readily reversible by the addition of salt. While fluorescence anisotropy measurements show a 1:1 stoichiometry at pH 5.5, we observed that a second HPV-16 E2 C-terminal dimer can bind per DNA site at pH 7.0. This was confirmed by displacement of bis-ANS binding, tryptophan fluorescence, native electrophoresis, and circular dichroism. The two binding events are nonequivalent, with a high-affinity binding involving one E2C dimer per DNA molecule with a K-D of 0.18 +/- 0.02 nM and a lower affinity binding mode of 2.0 +/- 0.2 nM. The bovine (BPV-1) E2 C-terminal domain binds to an HPV-16 E2 site with 350-fold lower affinity than the human cognate domain and binds 7-fold less tightly even to a bovine-derived DNA site. The ability to discriminate between cognate and noncognate sequences is 50-fold higher for the human domain, and the latter is 180-fold better than the bovine at discriminating specific from nonspecific DNA. A substantial conformational change in bound DNA is observed by near-UV circular dichroism. The bovine domain imposes a different DNA conformation than that caused by the human counterpart, which could be explained by a more pronounced bent. Structure-function differences and biochemical properties of the complexes depend on the protein domain rather than on the DNA, in line with crystallographic evidence. Despite the strong sequence homology and overall folding topology, the differences observed may explain the distinctive transcriptional regulation in bovine and human viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据