4.6 Article

Bone strain and microcracks at stress fracture sites in human metatarsals

期刊

BONE
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 827-833

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00402-6

关键词

bone; strain; microdamage; fatigue; metatarsal; stress fracture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microcracks in bone have been implicated in the development of stress fractures. The goal of this study was to evaluate bone strain and microcracks at locations where stress fractures are common (second metatarsal diaphysis) and rare (fifth metatarsal diaphysis) in an attempt to increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of stress fractures. A dynamic gait simulator was used to simulate normal walking with cadaver feet. The feet were loaded over the entire stance phase of gait and diaphyseal strains were recorded in second and fifth metatarsals. Microcrack density (Cr.Dn) and surface density (Cr.S.Dn) were determined in metatarsal cross sections from the contralateral feet. Bone strain was significantly higher in second metatarsals (-1897 +/- 613 microstrain) than in fifth metatarsals (-908 +/- 503 microstrain). However, second metatarsal Cr.Dn (0.23 +/- 0.15 #/mm(2)) was not significantly different from fifth metatarsal Cr.Dn (0.35 +/- 0.19 #/mm(2)). There was also no significant difference between Cr.S.Dn in second (17.64 +/- 10.99 mum/mm(2)) and fifth (26.70 +/- 15.53 mum/mm(2)) metatarsals. There were no significant relationships between the microcrack parameters and peak strain in either metatarsal, Cracks that occurred in trabecular struts (92 +/- 33 mum) were significantly longer than those found ending at cement lines (71 +/- 15 mum) and within osteons (57 +/- 16 mum). There were no significant relationships between the microcrack parameters and age in either metatarsal. Peak strain was more than twofold greater in second metatarsals than in fifth metatarsals for simulations of normal walking; however, microcrack parameters were unable to explain the greater incidence of second metatarsal stress fractures. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据