4.7 Article

Relative importance of transport and alkylation for pancreatic beta-cell toxicity of streptozotocin

期刊

DIABETOLOGIA
卷 43, 期 12, 页码 1528-1533

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s001250051564

关键词

streptozotocin; diabetes; RINm5F cells; streptozotocin derivatives; glucose transporter GLUT2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims/hypothesis. The role of selective uptake and alkylation in the diabetogenic action of streptozotocin was investigated in bioengineered RINm5F insulin-producing cells, with different expression levels of the glucose transporter GLUT2, by comparing the toxicity of streptozotocin with that of four chemically related alkylating compounds, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), N-ethyl-N nitrosourea (ENU), methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) and ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS). Methods. GLUT2 expressing RINm5F cells were generated through stable transfection of the rat glucose transporter GLUT;! cDNA under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter in the pcDNA3 vector. Viability of the cells was determined using a microtitre plate-based 3 - [4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Results. Cells expressing the glucose transporter GLUT2 were much more susceptible to streptozotocin toxicity than control cells due to the uptake of streptozotocin by this specific glucose transporter. In contrast, the GLUT2 expression had no effect upon the toxicity of MNU, ENU, MMS or EMS. Although the latter substances are, like streptozotocin, cytotoxic through their ability to cause DNA alkylation, they are not diabetogenic because they are not taken up through the glucose transporter GLU2. Conclusion/interpretation. Our results are consistent with the central importance of selective uptake and alkylating activity in the mechanism of streptozotocin diabetogenicity. Alkylation of DNA leads to necrosis of pancreatic beta cells and thus to a state of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, well-known as streptozotocin diabetes in experimental diabetes research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据