4.4 Article

Na+-independent proton secretion in MDCK-C11 cells

期刊

PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY
卷 441, 期 2-3, 页码 287-293

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004240000411

关键词

buffering capacity; H+-ATPase; H+-K+-ATPase; intracellular pH; MDCK-C11 cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work we studied the proton secretion mechanisms in recently cloned MDCK-C11 cells. We measured intracellular pH (pHi) in monolayers grown on permeable fillers, using the pH-sensitive probe BCECF and an inverted epifluorescence microscope. The cells have a basal pHi of 7.20+/-0.01 (n=136) and after an acid-releasing NH4Cl pulse pHi recovered at a rate (dpHi/dr) of 0.167+/-0.006 pH units/ per minute (n=20). This rate decreased significantly when Naf was removed from both cell surfaces, and was further reduced when they were both perfused with a solution containing no Na+ and K+. pHi recovery fell again in the presence of concanamycin (at a concentration of 4.6x10(-8) M; a specific inhibitor of the vacuolar H+-ATPase). When Na+ was removed from the apical or the basolateral side, pHi recovery (in pH units per minute) was significantly reduced to 0.099+/-0.008 (n=11) and 0.086+/-0.01 (n=10), respectively. The Na+-independent mechanism of pHi recovery was significantly inhibited by the presence of 5x10(-5) M Schering 28080 (an inhibitor of the H+-K+-ATPase) at the apical side (0.065+/-0.01 versus 0.099+/-0.008 pH units per minute, P<0.05), but not at the basolateral side (0.072+/-0.01 versus 0.086+/-0.01 pH units per minute). On the other hand, concanamycin inhibited the Na+-independent pHi recovery when applied apically (0.0304+/-0.005 pH units per minute, n=7) and basolaterally (0.025+/-0.004 pH units per minute, n=7). From these results we conclude that monolayers of MDCK-C11 cells have a Na+/H+ exchanger and a concanamycin-sensitive H+-ATPase on their apical and basolateral membranes; and a K+-dependent, Schering 28080-sensitive H+-K+-ATPase on their apical side.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据